|
Repugnancy costs are costs borne by an individual or entity as a result of a stimulus that goes against that individual or entity's cultural mores.〔Roth, Alvin E. (2007), "Repugnance as a constraint on markets," November, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 21 (3), Summer, pp. 37-58.〕〔Roth, Alvin E. (2007), "What Have We Learned From Market Design?," NBER Working Papers 13530, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 〕〔Michael Sandel (April 24, 2012), "What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets," Farrar, Straus and Giroux, ISBN 978-0-374-20303-0 〕〔(Two new books probe the limits of capitalism ) July 21st 2012 The Economist〕 The cost could be emotional, physical, mental or figurative. The stimulus could be anything from food to people to an idea. These costs are perspective-dependent and individual. These costs may be different for different groups of people; countries, states, ethnicities, etc.〔Elias, Julio J. (2008),("The Role of Repugnance in the Development of Markets: The. Case of the Market for Kidneys for Transplants," ) Working paper.〕 The term allows for a clear and understandable way of representing the concept of contextual stigma in a literal and applicable sense. == Origin == Repugnancy costs were first mentioned in a debate between Alvin Roth and Julio Elias on whether there should be an official market for kidneys.〔Elias, Julio J. and Roth, Alvin E. (2007),("Econ One on One: A Market for Kidneys?" ) The Wall Street Journal Online. 〕 The act of buying and selling organs may be against one's cultural mores; it may be repugnant. Hence, this is an additional costs one must bear if such a market was deemed repugnant in the context of one's culture. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Repugnancy costs」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|